Friday, November 8, 2013

Reuters: Politics: Female U.S. general who overturned sex-assault ruling to retire

Reuters: Politics
Reuters.com is your source for breaking news, business, financial and investing news, including personal finance and stocks. Reuters is the leading global provider of news, financial information and technology solutions to the world's media, financial institutions, businesses and individuals. // via fulltextrssfeed.com 
Female U.S. general who overturned sex-assault ruling to retire
Nov 9th 2013, 00:22

By David Alexander

WASHINGTON Fri Nov 8, 2013 7:22pm EST

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The first woman from the U.S. military to go into space has decided to retire after her promotion to a top Space Command job was blocked in the Senate due to her decision to overturn a sexual assault conviction.

Former space shuttle astronaut Lieutenant General Susan Helms has told the Air Force she plans to retire after more than 30 years of service, an Air Force spokesman said on Friday. The Senate Armed Services Committee confirmed that her nomination as vice commander of Air Force Space Command had been withdrawn.

Helms' nomination for the post ran into trouble due to concerns about her decision last year to overturn a conviction of an Air Force captain for aggravated sexual assault.

The officer had been accused of assaulting one woman in his bedroom after a night of drinking in 2010 and another in the back seat of a car in 2009.

Helms reviewed the evidence and decided to throw out the jury verdict.

A memo she wrote for her personal files said she found the captain's testimony more credible than that of the victims, said the Washington Post, which obtained a copy of the document. Instead of sexual assault, Helms found him guilty of the lesser offense of committing an indecent act.

Senator Claire McCaskill, a Missouri Democrat, put Helms' nomination on hold in April citing "deep concerns" about the general's decision to reverse the jury decision, which she said would erode confidence in the justice system.

In a statement on Friday, McCaskill praised Helms' career and her achievement in becoming the first female member of the U.S. forces in space, but said her decision to overturn the verdict, against the advice of her staff judge advocate, sent a "damaging message" to sexual assault victims.

"At a time when the military is facing a crisis of sexual assault, making a decision that sends a message which dissuades reporting of sexual assaults, supplants the finding of a jury, contradicts the advice of counsel, and further victimizes a survivor of sexual assault is unacceptable," McCaskill said.

JUMP IN SEXUAL ASSAULT CASES

The U.S. military has been struggling to deal with the problem of sexual assault and a surge in cases has embarrassed the military and increased congressional scrutiny of the problem. An Pentagon report in May found that estimated cases of unwanted sexual contact jumped 37 percent in 2012 to 26,000 versus 19,000 the previous year.

The head sexual assault prevention in the Air Force was arrested the weekend before the release of that report and accused of groping a woman while drunk in a parking lot not far from the Pentagon.

In a case similar to that involving Helms, a general in Europe overturned the sexual assault conviction of a fighter pilot in February, releasing him from prison and reinstating him to duty. The pilot was later made to retire.

Outrage over the problem of sexual assault in the military has prompted lawmakers to look for ways to address the issue and for the military to initiate a more vigorous response.

A panel established by Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel at the behest of Congress held a hearing this week.

New figures released at the hearing showed a 46 percent year-on-year jump in reports of sexual assault in the first nine months of the 2013 fiscal year, to 3,553 compared with 2,434. The 2013 fiscal year began October 1, 2012.

Officials said the increase in reporting was a sign victims were beginning to have more confidence that the military was seriously attempting to address the problem.

The issue has divided lawmakers on Capitol Hill. Senator Kirsten Gillibrand, a New York Democrat, launched a push with several colleagues this week to win support for legislation that would remove sexual assault prosecutions from the military chain of command, a move opposed by the top military officers.

McCaskill has opposed that measure, as has Senator Carl Levin, the chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee.

Helms, 55, became a NASA astronaut in 1991 and flew aboard the space shuttle Endeavour in 1993 to become the first woman from the U.S. military in space. She currently commands two space related units at Vandenberg Air Force Base in California.

(Reporting by David Alexander; Editing by David Brunnstrom)

  • Link this
  • Share this
  • Digg this
  • Email
  • Print
  • Reprints

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

Reuters: Politics: New U.S. rules require equal insurance coverage for mental ills

Reuters: Politics
Reuters.com is your source for breaking news, business, financial and investing news, including personal finance and stocks. Reuters is the leading global provider of news, financial information and technology solutions to the world's media, financial institutions, businesses and individuals. // via fulltextrssfeed.com 
New U.S. rules require equal insurance coverage for mental ills
Nov 9th 2013, 00:05

By Sharon Begley

NEW YORK Fri Nov 8, 2013 7:05pm EST

NEW YORK (Reuters) - Most Americans with health insurance will be guaranteed access to mental health services, including for depression and alcoholism, equal to medical and surgical treatment under long-delayed rules issued on Friday by the Obama administration. But the protections do not apply to tens of millions of people, including the elderly.

The rules implement the 2008 Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act, which took on greater urgency with the administration's vow to address gun violence after a series of mass shootings across the United States in the past few years.

Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius estimated that 90 percent of Americans with substance-use disorders do not receive the care they need.

"For way too long, health plans openly discriminated against" Americans with mental illness, she said in a call with reporters on Friday. Labor Secretary Thomas Perez said mental illnesses "the stepchildren of the healthcare system."

In any given year, about one-quarter of American adults have a mental illness that meets diagnostic criteria, says the National Institute of Mental Health.

Under the final rules, health plans must not have different co-pays, deductibles or visit limits for mental disorders and substance abuse than they do for other illnesses.

If they allow people to receive treatment out-of-state for, say, heart disease, then they must do so for mental illness as well. If an insurance plan uses particular clinical guidelines in determining what medical conditions and treatments to cover, it must use comparable ones for mental disorders.

Covered health plans are also prohibited from imposing a separate deductible for mental health treatment. And they cannot limit patients to receiving mental health treatment only from, say, licensed social workers rather than physicians and psychologists, as some plans have in an effort to limit spending.

The rules had been so long in coming that, on Thursday, former Congressman Patrick Kennedy, who was instrumental in passing the 2008 law, told a Senate panel that it had "entered a kind of twilight zone." The five-year wait was a "particularly bad example" of how laws can languish without being implemented, said Kennedy, who has discussed his battles with bipolar disorder and addiction to prescription drugs.

After passage of the 2008 mental health parity law, more than 30 states passed laws of their own implementing its requirements. But the largest plans, since they are regulated at the federal level, were not affected by state laws.

President Barack Obama's healthcare reform law requires that all individual and employer-based health insurance policies, including those sold on the state-based insurance exchanges, cover mental health and substance abuse as one of 10 "essential health benefits." The only exceptions are those few plans that have been unchanged since the law was signed in March 2010.

As a result, the final rules on mental health parity have already been largely incorporated into plans sold since October 1 on the online exchanges set up under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, also known as Obamacare. They are also part of most employer-based plans, according to the administration, which estimates that mental health treatments make up 5 percent of the benefits that plans pay for.

There are still loopholes, however.

The parity rules do not apply to standard Medicaid plans, the joint federal-state program for poor Americans. If states require Medicaid beneficiaries to enroll in managed care plans, however, those plans must cover mental health treatment.

A bigger loophole is that the rules do not apply to Medicare, the government-run healthcare program for the elderly. The 2008 parity law had that exemption "because it was a cost issue," said Andrew Sperling, director of legislative advocacy for the National Alliance on Mental Illness (NAMI). "They would have had to make up the additional costs elsewhere" by cutting other benefits, "and Congress didn't want to do that."

Depression alone affects more than 6.5 million of the 35 million Americans old enough for Medicare, NAMI estimates.

"Medicare," said Kennedy, "still has a distance to cover in its journey to parity."

Large employer-based plans also have an escape hatch. If mental-health parity causes their costs to increase at least 2 percent in the first year it's in place, or 1 percent any subsequent year, the plan may apply for an exemption. NAMI's Sperling believes the exemption will be onerous enough to apply and qualify for that few employers will request it, however.

The mental-health parity law does not apply at all to group insurance plans at private companies that cover 50 or fewer employees.

(Reporting by Sharon Begley; Editing by Grant McCool)

  • Link this
  • Share this
  • Digg this
  • Email
  • Print
  • Reprints

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

Reuters: Politics: U.S., Germany discuss intelligence cooperation after Merkel affair

Reuters: Politics
Reuters.com is your source for breaking news, business, financial and investing news, including personal finance and stocks. Reuters is the leading global provider of news, financial information and technology solutions to the world's media, financial institutions, businesses and individuals. // via fulltextrssfeed.com 
U.S., Germany discuss intelligence cooperation after Merkel affair
Nov 8th 2013, 20:44

By Mark Hosenball

WASHINGTON Fri Nov 8, 2013 3:44pm EST

Antennas of the former National Security Agency (NSA) listening station are seen at the Teufelsberg hill, or Devil's Mountain in Berlin, November 5, 2013. REUTERS/Fabrizio Bensch

Antennas of the former National Security Agency (NSA) listening station are seen at the Teufelsberg hill, or Devil's Mountain in Berlin, November 5, 2013.

Credit: Reuters/Fabrizio Bensch

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - After disclosures that the U.S. National Security Agency tapped German Chancellor Angela Merkel's cellphone, Washington and Berlin are discussing new rules to govern dealings between their spy agencies, U.S. and European officials said.

Senior German officials, including the chiefs of Germany's foreign intelligence service, the BND, and its domestic security agency, the BfV, met with Obama administration and U.S. intelligence officials last weekend to discuss how to reshape intelligence cooperation.

Current and former U.S. officials familiar with U.S. spy programs say the United States is likely to be willing to agree to some kind of pledge - either public or private - that American agencies will not engage in industrial or commercial espionage against German targets.

Such a promise would be an unusual step for the United States, but it would be easy for the Obama administration to make because current rules governing the National Security Agency and other U.S. spy agencies already prohibit spying for commercial benefit.

Washington would be much less willing to give the same sort of pledge to other allies, most notably France, which have large state-owned industries and a reputation for aggressive official industrial espionage, U.S. and European officials said.

The visit to Washington by the German officials followed revelations by German media, based on documents leaked by former NSA contractor Edward Snowden, that the NSA targeted Merkel's phone for eavesdropping. U.S. officials did not deny the report but said any such spying has now ceased.

A European official said Merkel was not particularly distressed at the revelations as she recognized her cellphone was an insecure means of communication and was careful and cryptic as to what she talked about on it.

Nonetheless, the public and political uproar caused by the affair and by other German media revelations based on Snowden's material - including alleged NSA spying on the United Nations and European Union - prompted German officials to seek urgent consultations with their American counterparts to review the rules for intelligence cooperation.

U.S. and German officials are working on a secret agreement to govern day-to-day intelligence dealings between the two countries, a European official said.

Caitlin Hayden, a spokeswoman for the White House National Security Staff, declined to provide details of the talks.

"We are open to discussions with our close allies and partners about how we can better coordinate our intelligence efforts, but I'm not going to get into the details of our diplomatic discussions," she said.

The secret agreement would be aimed at simplifying the relationship with Germany and strengthening rather than restricting cooperation between the two countries' spy agencies, officials said.

U.S. and German intelligence relations are currently run under a patchwork of agreements between individual U.S. spy agencies, such as the NSA, the Central Intelligence Agency and the National Reconnaissance Office, with the BND, or Germany's Federal Intelligence Service, which incorporates the functions of a multiplicity of U.S. agencies.

(Editing by Alistair Bell and David Brunnstrom)

  • Link this
  • Share this
  • Digg this
  • Email
  • Print
  • Reprints

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

Reuters: Politics: Obamacare adviser says healthcare website encountering new issues

Reuters: Politics
Reuters.com is your source for breaking news, business, financial and investing news, including personal finance and stocks. Reuters is the leading global provider of news, financial information and technology solutions to the world's media, financial institutions, businesses and individuals. // via fulltextrssfeed.com 
Obamacare adviser says healthcare website encountering new issues
Nov 8th 2013, 19:16

A man looks over the Affordable Care Act (commonly known as Obamacare) signup page on the HealthCare.gov website in New York in this October 2, 2013 photo illustration.

Credit: Reuters/Mike Segar

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

Reuters: Politics: New York's business leaders may back new mayor on taxes

Reuters: Politics
Reuters.com is your source for breaking news, business, financial and investing news, including personal finance and stocks. Reuters is the leading global provider of news, financial information and technology solutions to the world's media, financial institutions, businesses and individuals. // via fulltextrssfeed.com 
New York's business leaders may back new mayor on taxes
Nov 8th 2013, 19:21

By Edward Krudy

NEW YORK Fri Nov 8, 2013 2:21pm EST

Incoming New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio exits City Hall after meeting with Mayor Michael Bloomberg in New York November 6, 2013. REUTERS/Andrew Kelly

Incoming New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio exits City Hall after meeting with Mayor Michael Bloomberg in New York November 6, 2013.

Credit: Reuters/Andrew Kelly

NEW YORK (Reuters) - New York's business leaders may be open to a plan to levy a surcharge on higher earners in what could be a boost to mayor-elect Bill de Blasio when he lobbies the state legislature to approve the measure in next year's budget.

Backing from New York's business elite will be important to get the needed votes in Albany, the state capital, where the legislature is divided between Democrats and Republicans. De Blasio is likely to get a more favorable reception if he can show broad support from the city's various interest groups.

De Blasio's plan to increase city taxes from 3.9 percent to 4.4 percent on those making over $500,000, in order to raise $530 million to expand pre school programs, has already attracted support from some high-level Albany Democrats, who are conscious of his landslide victory where he captured over 70 percent of the vote.

Senate co-leader Jeffrey Klein and Assembly leader Sheldon Silver have both been quoted as backing the plan. Even so, getting Albany to agree to a tax increase will not be a easy. State Governor Andrew Cuomo, who has committed to keeping taxes in check, would also have to sign off on the idea.

Steven Witkoff, chairman of The Witkoff Group, a real estate developer that owns landmark New York buildings like the Woolworth tower, believes the plan is one New York's business leaders could be persuaded to embrace.

"If you listen to the way he asks for it, it's completely responsible. He says I'd like people who have done really well out there to help and pay their fair share for those who need more help," said Witkoff, citing his Bronx upbringing and New York public school education.

"If I had a surcharge and it cost me $1,500 to $2,000 a year in tax for there to be this program for early start, I think that's a home run," he said. "If you live in this town, how do you not want to pay more tax for early education prospects for New York City kids?"

A MODEST PROPOSAL

Backing for higher taxes would have to be part of a wider conversation about public safety, regulation, enforcement and business incentives, said Kathryn Wylde, president and chief executive of The Partnership for New York City, which represents 200 companies that employ around 775,000 New Yorkers.

"It's possible, yes," said Wylde when asked if the group might support De Blasio as he takes his case for the tax levy to Albany. But she added: "We would certainly oppose the tax increase in the absence of a larger commitment to how the city is going to maintain its competitive environment."

The group says its member firms contribute $143 billion to New York City's annual output, nearly a quarter.

Wylde made her comments at the end of a fiercely fought mayoral campaign. De Blasio's vow to levy the surcharge as well as cut tax breaks to corporations drew criticism that he would scare off investment and drive jobs out of the city.

An analysis by the New York's publicly-funded Independent Budget Office shows that earners making an annual $750,000 to $1 million per year would pay an extra $1,335 to $2,670 under the new surcharge. About 51,300 of New York's 3.5 million taxpayers would have to pay the tax, the IBO said.

De Blasio first introduced the proposal at a meeting of the Association for a Better New York, another business group. The group's chairman Bill Rudin declined to comment.

Right-leaning think tanks like the Manhattan Policy Institute say New York is already one of the most heavily taxed cities in the United States and is facing increasing competition from other locations that are set to benefit if New York hikes taxes and cuts business incentives.

Other economists say there is scant evidence to suggest marginal tax increases will lead to an outflow of wealthy tax payers, jobs, and businesses.

"There is absolutely zero evidence that a tax increase of that magnitude will effect anybody's location decision," said James Parrott, chief economist of the Fiscal Policy Institute. "The proposal that De Blasio has, in the scheme of things, is pretty modest."

(Reporting by Edward Krudy; Editing by Nick Zieminski)

  • Link this
  • Share this
  • Digg this
  • Email
  • Print
  • Reprints

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

Reuters: Politics: Washington envoy to press China on currency in Beijing visit

Reuters: Politics
Reuters.com is your source for breaking news, business, financial and investing news, including personal finance and stocks. Reuters is the leading global provider of news, financial information and technology solutions to the world's media, financial institutions, businesses and individuals. // via fulltextrssfeed.com 
Washington envoy to press China on currency in Beijing visit
Nov 8th 2013, 17:47

U.S. Treasury Secretary Jack Lew speaks at Center for American Progress 10th Anniversary policy forum in Washington, October 24, 2013.

Credit: Reuters/Yuri Gripas

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

Reuters: Politics: White House says 'premature' to criticize nuclear deal with Iran

Reuters: Politics
Reuters.com is your source for breaking news, business, financial and investing news, including personal finance and stocks. Reuters is the leading global provider of news, financial information and technology solutions to the world's media, financial institutions, businesses and individuals. // via fulltextrssfeed.com 
White House says 'premature' to criticize nuclear deal with Iran
Nov 8th 2013, 17:33

ABOARD AIR FORCE ONE Fri Nov 8, 2013 12:33pm EST

  • Tweet
  • Share this
  • Email
  • Print
U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry arrives in Tel Aviv, November 8, 2013. REUTERS/Jason Reed

U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry arrives in Tel Aviv, November 8, 2013.

Credit: Reuters/Jason Reed

ABOARD AIR FORCE ONE (Reuters) - The White House said on Friday that it was "premature" to criticize a deal being discussed in Geneva for Iran to curb its nuclear program because an agreement has not yet been reached.

"There is no deal, but there is an opportunity here for a possible diplomatic solution, and that is exactly what we are pursuing," said Josh Earnest, deputy White House spokesman, to reporters traveling with President Barack Obama on Air Force One to New Orleans.

"So any critique of the deal is premature," Earnest said.

Tehran is seeking relief from financial sanctions imposed by the United States and the European Union that have slashed its oil sales, severely hurting its economy.

Obama said on Thursday that he was open to "modest relief" on sanctions if Iran halts advancements on its nuclear program as negotiations on a permanent deal continue.

Asked about sharp criticism of the proposals by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Earnest said that the United States and Israel are "in complete agreement about the need to prevent Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon."

Secretary of State John Kerry has traveled to Geneva where Iran and major powers are holding high-stakes talks with Iran on curbing its nuclear program.

(Reporting by Roberta Rampton; Editing by Sandra Maler and Jim Loney)

  • Tweet this
  • Link this
  • Share this
  • Digg this
  • Email
  • Print
  • Reprints
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

Reuters: Politics: Utech to become Obama's top climate, energy adviser

Reuters: Politics
Reuters.com is your source for breaking news, business, financial and investing news, including personal finance and stocks. Reuters is the leading global provider of news, financial information and technology solutions to the world's media, financial institutions, businesses and individuals. // via fulltextrssfeed.com 
Utech to become Obama's top climate, energy adviser
Nov 8th 2013, 17:17

WASHINGTON Fri Nov 8, 2013 12:17pm EST

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Dan Utech, a long-time Washington insider on environmental issues, will become President Barack Obama's top adviser on energy and climate change, a White House official said on Friday, a role that will involve tough decisions on power plants and TransCanada Corp's Keystone XL pipeline.

The move had been widely expected after the Obama administration said earlier this month that Heather Zichal, who served five years in the position, would step down. Her last day is Friday.

Utech will help Obama implement his climate action plan, which involves limiting carbon emissions from power plants and the pipeline project that would link Canada's oil sands with refineries in Texas.

Obama set a June 2014 deadline for the Environmental Protection Agency to propose limits on existing power plants, one of the top U.S. greenhouse gas sources. The rules need to be finalized a year after that.

A decision on the Keystone XL pipeline is expected next year, after the State Department and other agencies weigh in on whether the project is in the national interest. Obama said in August he could not approve the project if it significantly worsened climate change.

Utech, the deputy director for climate at the White House, was also a one-time adviser to former Energy Secretary Steven Chu. Before that he served as an aide in the U.S. Senate for a decade, working on energy and environmental issues.

"Dan Utech is a worthy successor to Heather Zichal," said Daniel Weiss, a senior fellow and director of climate strategy at the Center for American Progress. "He brings keen analytical and political skill to the challenge of making President Obama's Climate Action Plan into reality."

Zichal was "a trusted advisor" and "has been a strong and steady voice for policies that reduce America's dependence on foreign oil, protect public health and our environment, and combat the threat of global climate change," Obama said in a statement.

(Reporting by Timothy Gardner, Roberta Rampton and Patrick Rucker; editing by Jackie Frank)

  • Link this
  • Share this
  • Digg this
  • Email
  • Print
  • Reprints

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

Reuters: Politics: After Washington GMO label battle, both sides eye national fight

Reuters: Politics
Reuters.com is your source for breaking news, business, financial and investing news, including personal finance and stocks. Reuters is the leading global provider of news, financial information and technology solutions to the world's media, financial institutions, businesses and individuals. // via fulltextrssfeed.com 
After Washington GMO label battle, both sides eye national fight
Nov 8th 2013, 17:59

By Carey Gillam

Fri Nov 8, 2013 12:59pm EST

(Reuters) - Both sides of the costly and high-stakes GMO labeling battle in Washington state say they see an even bigger national fight ahead despite the apparent defeat of the mandatory labeling measure by Washington state voters this week.

The measure died 47.05 percent to 52.95 percent, according to results updated Thursday night by the Washington Secretary of State's office as results continued to trickle in. The likely loss followed a similar defeat last year in California when a ballot initiative there also failed to pass.

"It is pretty well beyond any doubt," said Secretary of State elections division spokesman David Ammons of the apparent defeat of the labeling proposal. Results will be certified on December 4 and are unlikely to change much, he added.

The measures in Washington and California had early strong support in polls. That support ebbed as food and agricultural industry players poured millions of dollars into advertising campaigns spelling out what the industry groups said were deep flaws in the proposed laws. A consortium that includes General Mills, Nestle USA, PepsiCo, Monsanto,; and other corporate giants, contributed roughly $22 million to kill the labeling law.

Despite the Washington loss, proponents pushing for labeling on food made from genetically modified crops cite progress in 20 other U.S. states, particularly in Massachusetts, New York and New Hampshire. They say they will also turn up the pressure on federal lawmakers and regulators.

The 2016 presidential election is a prime target for more ballot initiative efforts due to higher voter turnout, they say.

"We'll keep bringing the fight until they give in," said David Bronner, who has contributed more than $2 million to the labeling effort through a California organic soap company he owns. "The commitment of our movement... is huge and growing."

Opponents of labeling say they do not want to keep waging a multi-million-dollar, state-by-state fight against mandatory GMO labeling. Any labeling should be voluntary and follow standards set at the federal level as state-by-state labeling could create costly problems for food manufacturing and distribution channels, they say.

The Grocery Manufacturers Association, (GMA) which represents more than 300 food companies, is funding efforts in 25 states to defeat labeling measures. The group is pushing for a "federal solution that will protect consumers by ensuring that the FDA, America's leading food safety authority, sets national standards for the safety and labeling of products made with GMO ingredients," GMA CEO Pamela Bailey said in a statement.

Officials at Monsanto, which spent more than $5 million to kill the Washington measure, say labeling supporters are trying to create the false impression that biotech foods are harmful.

"We absolutely support the consumer's right to know," said Robb Fraley, chief technology officer at Monsanto, the world's largest seed company. "But we can't support misleading labels that infer there is something unsafe about biotech products."

Monsanto has developed an array of biotech corn, soybeans and other crops that have been genetically altered to repel pests and tolerate direct spraying of herbicides. Those crops are used in a vast array of food products.

The companies say the crops are safe and many scientific studies back those claims. But there are also studies showing links to human and animal health problems, and environmental damage.

Proponents of labeling fear the food and biotech agriculture companies will seek a federal ban to pre-empt more state labeling efforts. But they continue to express confidence in long-term victory.

"There is growing consumer outrage and backlash," said Dave Murphy, executive director of Food Democracy Now, a consumer group that support labeling. "We are going to wear them down. We are going to win."

(Reporting By Carey Gillam; editing by Andrew Hay)

  • Link this
  • Share this
  • Digg this
  • Email
  • Print
  • Reprints

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

Reuters: Politics: Sebelius sees no specific fix yet on U.S. health policy cancellations

Reuters: Politics
Reuters.com is your source for breaking news, business, financial and investing news, including personal finance and stocks. Reuters is the leading global provider of news, financial information and technology solutions to the world's media, financial institutions, businesses and individuals. // via fulltextrssfeed.com 
Sebelius sees no specific fix yet on U.S. health policy cancellations
Nov 8th 2013, 15:56

U.S. Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius testifies before a Senate Finance Committee hearing on ''Health Insurance Exchanges: An Update from the Administration'' and the issues surrounding the Obama administration health plan commonly referred to as ''Obamacare,'' on Capitol Hill in Washington November 6, 2013.

Credit: Reuters/Jim Bourg

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

Reuters: Politics: Conservative groups keep up pressure amid U.S. budget talks

Reuters: Politics
Reuters.com is your source for breaking news, business, financial and investing news, including personal finance and stocks. Reuters is the leading global provider of news, financial information and technology solutions to the world's media, financial institutions, businesses and individuals. // via fulltextrssfeed.com 
Conservative groups keep up pressure amid U.S. budget talks
Nov 8th 2013, 14:20

By Caren Bohan

WASHINGTON Fri Nov 8, 2013 9:20am EST

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Influential U.S. conservative groups are lobbying Republican lawmakers on a bipartisan budget negotiating panel to stand firm in opposition to tax increases and any easing of automatic spending cuts known as the "sequester."

Pressure from the outside groups could raise the chances of a stalemate in the panel's efforts to craft a deficit-reduction deal. The committee faces a December 13 deadline to agree on a plan designed in part to avoid a repeat of the September budget standoff that led to a 16-day government shutdown.

Groups such as the Club for Growth, FreedomWorks and Heritage Action for America wield enormous clout with Tea Party-oriented Republicans. They were key players battling against compromise in last month's budget drama, pressuring House of Representatives Republicans to refuse to fund the government unless Democrats agreed to measures to weaken President Barack Obama's signature healthcare law known as "Obamacare."

The 29-member budget negotiating committee, comprised of Republican and Democratic members from the House and Senate, was commissioned under a deal that ended the shutdown and prevented a possible default by the United States on its obligations.

Among other things, the panel is considering ways to relieve the effects of automatic spending cuts, known as the "sequester," imposed on military and other government programs starting last year and continuing through 2021.

In the absence of any broader deficit-reduction measures, many conservatives want to preserve the sequester as the only real cut of significance they've been able to achieve.

"Yes, we're worried," said Andrew Roth, vice president of government affairs at the Club for Growth, which favors limited government. "We're always worried when they go behind closed doors and try and hatch something."

"To us a bad deal is a deal that increases spending or taxes," said Dean Clancy, vice president of public policy at FreedomWorks, which advocates for low taxes and spending cuts.

Although higher tax revenue is a key demand of Democrats on the panel, most Republicans on the budget panel have ruled it out. Among those opposed to new revenue is the lead Republican negotiator, Paul Ryan, who is chairman of the House of Representatives Budget Committee.

"There's always a risk that they're going to do something like this," Roth said, referring to revenue increases but he said he didn't think such a deal would ever get approval in the Republican-led House of Representatives because most rank-and-file lawmakers staunchly oppose that.

Clancy said he found it "troubling" that one Republican House member on the panel, Tom Cole of Oklahoma, told Bloomberg Television last month that he might be open to raising some revenue.

"Mr. Cole's comments alarmed us because if he were to join with the House Democrats, they would have a majority for tax hikes."

The disagreement between Democrats and Republicans over taxes is a huge stumbling block to any broader deal and could even stymie a smaller agreement.

One of Democrats' main goals is to ease the impact of the across-the-board spending cuts that have forced cuts in programs ranging from early childhood education to food-safety inspections to scientific research to the military.

Republicans have said they would be willing to reduce the size of the cuts in exchange for reductions in entitlements such as the Social Security retirement program and the Medicare health program for older Americans. Democrats say they would only support such cuts if they were accompanied by revenue increases.

"I think expectations for the committee are extremely low," said Dan Holler, a spokesman for Heritage Action, which is the political arm of the conservative Heritage Foundation think tank.

Holler said that with the congressional elections coming up in November 2014, he felt confident Republicans would want to avoid having their "fingerprints" on any kind of a tax increase.

"Right now, it's just a bunch of conversations happening," Holler said. He said that for now, Heritage Action is keeping in close touch with lawmakers and their staff and will decide what position to take if and when the panel arrives at a recommendation.

Clancy of FreedomWorks said his group was keeping in touch with Ryan and other members.

"The grassroots feels cheated and betrayed by Republican leaders who have run on promises to cut spending and stop Obamacare but have proved unable to keep those promise and perhaps unwilling to," Clancy said. "So our expectations are low and pessimistic and that's why I say for us, no deal is better than a bad deal."

(Reporting by Caren Bohan; editing by Fred Barbash and Jackie Frank)

  • Link this
  • Share this
  • Digg this
  • Email
  • Print
  • Reprints

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

Reuters: Politics: Obama seeks to turn conversation from healthcare woes to economy

Reuters: Politics
Reuters.com is your source for breaking news, business, financial and investing news, including personal finance and stocks. Reuters is the leading global provider of news, financial information and technology solutions to the world's media, financial institutions, businesses and individuals. // via fulltextrssfeed.com 
Obama seeks to turn conversation from healthcare woes to economy
Nov 8th 2013, 11:01

WASHINGTON Fri Nov 8, 2013 6:01am EST

U.S. President Barack Obama waves as he walks on the South Lawn of the White House in Washington before his departure to the Walter Reed National Military Medical Center in Bethesda, Maryland, November 5, 2013 to visit with wounded service members. REUTERS/Yuri Gripas

U.S. President Barack Obama waves as he walks on the South Lawn of the White House in Washington before his departure to the Walter Reed National Military Medical Center in Bethesda, Maryland, November 5, 2013 to visit with wounded service members.

Credit: Reuters/Yuri Gripas

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - President Barack Obama will try to shift the national conversation to economic growth from unhappiness over insurance policy cancellations under his signature healthcare law as he visits the Port of New Orleans on Friday.

The day after Obama said in a nationally televised interview he was sorry some Americans were dropped by their health plans because of changes mandated by the Affordable Care Act, he will tour a busy cargo and cruise ship port, the White House said.

He will again deliver the message that the United States should spend more on its roads, bridges and ports as a way to expand jobs and strengthen U.S. firms through increased trade.

His remarks will come on the day the government releases a jobs report for October, which is expected to show U.S. employers added 125,000 positions in the month.

That number was likely half as much as employers would have added if not for the 16-day government shutdown in October, the White House has estimated.

The administration has drummed home the point the economy would be growing more rapidly and job growth would be more robust without the shutdown, prompted by Republican efforts to defund or delay the healthcare law, known as Obamacare.

The White House budget office issued a report on Thursday cataloguing ways in which the shutdown had hurt individuals and businesses.

The Mississippi River port will give an Obama an appropriate setting to talk about his proposal to spend $50 billion to repair and upgrade the nation's infrastructure and efforts to expand trade.

The president "believes that exports are central to our national economy and has made increasing exports a major focus for his administration," the White House said in a statement.

But Obama's efforts to press Congress for more spending to strengthen economic growth will be overshadowed by lingering questions about Obamacare.

HEALTHCARE HEADACHES

The botched rollout of the online signup mechanism for insurance was the first major problem for the program, which aims to extend access to healthcare for millions of uninsured Americans by offering insurance at competitive prices.

A second snag has been a spate of insurance cancellations despite Obama's pledge that consumers could keep their existing health plans if they wanted them.

The setbacks have given ammunition to the law's many foes and skeptics and raised doubts whether the healthcare plans can attract enough healthy young people to keep the costs of insurance low.

Louisiana Governor Bobby Jindal, a Republican, will be at the port when Obama delivers his remarks. But Jindal made clear on Thursday his disagreement with Obama on healthcare and other issues.

"Obamacare is not smart policy and will not work," he said. "The website is merely the tip of the iceberg here."

Jindal also took issue with Obama's prescription for more spending to repair infrastructure.

"We keep increasing spending, adding entitlements, adding regulations, and adding taxes," Jindal said. "If the president wants to grow the American economy, he's got to force government to do just the opposite."

(Reporting by Mark Felsenthal; Editing by Peter Cooney)

  • Link this
  • Share this
  • Digg this
  • Email
  • Print
  • Reprints

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

Thursday, November 7, 2013

Reuters: Politics: Pentagon offset budget cut impact in key areas -watchdog

Reuters: Politics
Reuters.com is your source for breaking news, business, financial and investing news, including personal finance and stocks. Reuters is the leading global provider of news, financial information and technology solutions to the world's media, financial institutions, businesses and individuals. // via fulltextrssfeed.com 
Pentagon offset budget cut impact in key areas -watchdog
Nov 8th 2013, 03:36

By David Alexander

WASHINGTON Thu Nov 7, 2013 10:36pm EST

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - When $37 billion in budget cuts hit the Pentagon abruptly early this year, officials took steps that minimized the impact on key areas like the Afghanistan war but also took action that could raise long-run costs, a watchdog agency said on Thursday.

The Pentagon was hit by the reductions in March, almost midway through its fiscal year, as part of across-the-board government budget cuts that slashed its approved spending level for the year to about $490 billion from $527 billion.

The Government Accountability Office said that even as the Pentagon reduced Army training, put civilian workers on unpaid leave and cut aircraft flight hours, it was able to shift money among accounts with congressional approval and take other steps to offset some impact of the cuts.

"By setting priorities for funding and using available prior year unobligated balances (funds) to help meet required reductions, DoD (the Defense Department) was able to protect or minimize disruptions in certain key areas," like overseas operations and major defense programs, the GAO report said.

In addition, because of the flexibility it received to shift some funding from lesser priorities, the Pentagon "was able to manage and, in some cases, later reverse some initial actions taken to implement the spending reductions, such as resuming aircraft training," the 44-page report said.

However, the report also said that the Pentagon had adjusted procurement programs by deferring modifications and delaying systems development and testing. It said defense officials had indicated that these actions could result in higher costs in the coming years.

Pentagon Comptroller Robert Hale said the department assisted with the GAO report and thought it was "technically correct," but he added that the purpose of the study was not to examine the impact of the budget cuts or to highlight their effects on the department.

"What I want to make clear is that sequestration did have serious adverse effects on the Department of Defense," he said in an interview. "It led to a number of problems, some of which remain today."

His comments echoed those by the top U.S. military chiefs at a congressional hearing on Thursday. General Ray Odierno, the Army chief of staff, and the leaders of the other service branches warned that the cuts had severely damaged the military's readiness for war.

Hale said the Pentagon had a deep shortfall in its war funding account early in the year because cost estimates made two years earlier were off. The department had to cut elsewhere to make up the difference, for example halting training at the Army's combat training centers.

The Air Force stopped flying 12 combat squadrons for three months, the Pentagon cut back on base maintenance and it laid off temporary and term workers. A faster-than-expected reduction in military personnel saved some money, and much of the rest was shifted from procurement programs and research.

"Defense is an insurance policy," Hale said. "We have chosen to greatly increase the deductible. If you never have to use the policy, no problem. If you have to use the policy, you'll pay for it."

In the event of an emergency, the department would the face difficult choice of waiting to train its forces before sending them, or deploying them before they are fully trained, he said.

The GAO report did not draw conclusions about the effectiveness of the Pentagon's efforts to address the March cuts, which went into effect under a mechanism known as sequestration after a budgetary impasse in Congress. It just reported the steps the department took to implement the cuts and offset their impact.

The Pentagon is facing budget cuts totaling some $500 billion under sequestration over the next decade after Congress failed to reach a deal on an alternative package of spending reductions and new revenue. The military is facing a new round of cuts in January unless Congress takes action to eliminate them.

(Reporting by David Alexander; Editing by David Brunnstrom)

  • Link this
  • Share this
  • Digg this
  • Email
  • Print
  • Reprints

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

Reuters: Politics: Obama's tech expert too busy fixing website to testify

Reuters: Politics
Reuters.com is your source for breaking news, business, financial and investing news, including personal finance and stocks. Reuters is the leading global provider of news, financial information and technology solutions to the world's media, financial institutions, businesses and individuals. // via fulltextrssfeed.com 
Obama's tech expert too busy fixing website to testify
Nov 8th 2013, 02:20

WASHINGTON Thu Nov 7, 2013 9:20pm EST

A man looks over the Affordable Care Act (commonly known as Obamacare) signup page on the HealthCare.gov website in New York in this October 2, 2013 photo illustration. REUTERS/Mike Segar

A man looks over the Affordable Care Act (commonly known as Obamacare) signup page on the HealthCare.gov website in New York in this October 2, 2013 photo illustration.

Credit: Reuters/Mike Segar

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The chief technology officer for the White House is willing to testify to a powerful oversight committee in the U.S. House of Representatives, but Todd Park is still too busy trying to fix the glitch-ridden Obamacare website to appear, the White House said on Thursday.

Republican Darrell Issa said he wants to hear from Park and other top Obama administration tech officials next Wednesday about why HealthCare.gov has performed so poorly, potentially preventing millions of people from enrolling in new online health insurance exchanges.

Issa, noting that Park was a "central leader" in the website's development, asked him to reconsider his decision by Friday or potentially face a subpoena compelling him to testify.

Park is open to meeting with Issa's staff informally in late November and would testify at a hearing sometime in the first two weeks of December, said Donna Pignatelli, the assistant director for legislative affairs in the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy.

"Because Mr. Park is currently occupied full time on the critically important work of improving the website for the millions of Americans seeking affordable health insurance options, his testimony needs to be scheduled at a time that is less disruptive to that work," Pignatelli said in a letter to Issa.

IT ENTREPRENEUR

Park's precise role in the website's insurance marketplaces is unclear, although he has been deeply involved in the round-the-clock effort to try to fix the bugs, occasionally sleeping on a mat in his office.

Before joining the Obama administration, Park was a successful healthcare IT developer, steering Athenahealth through a blockbuster IPO, and helping start another company, Castlight, which provides data on healthcare costs.

The 40-year-old helped build the original HealthCare.gov website in 90 days in 2010 when he was chief technology officer at the Department of Health and Human Services. The website then provided information about public and private insurance programs, sorted by zipcode.

Elijah Cummings, the top Democrat on the House Oversight panel, chastised Issa for the threat and for ignoring Park's offer to testify in December.

"I am personally very concerned that the Chairman's actions may have a direct and negative impact on efforts to fix HealthCare.gov, which would aggravate the problem rather than help solve it," Cummings said in a statement.

Issa is a strong critic of the Obama administration. He has launched a number of probes, including one into the Internal Revenue Service's scrutiny of conservative groups seeking tax-exempt status, and a "Fast and Furious" investigation into a failed U.S. government sting operation involving gun running.

The hearing next week could shed light on what role various officials played in developing the site's technology. So far, the project appears to have been spread out among offices and federal contractors without strong oversight.

Other officials due to appear include Steve VanRoekel, chief information officer at the White House and Henry Chao, deputy chief information officer at the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services.

The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, President Barack Obama's signature healthcare law, was passed in 2010 and upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court last year. It requires most Americans to have health insurance beginning January 1 or pay a fine.

Republicans see the Democratic president's program as a costly expansion of government and fear Obamacare is too complicated and expensive to work.

(Additional reporting By Karey Van Hall; Editing by Xavier Briand and Ken Wills)

  • Link this
  • Share this
  • Digg this
  • Email
  • Print
  • Reprints

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

 
Great HTML Templates from easytemplates.com.